Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Poem Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night By Dylan Thomas Essays

Poem ?Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night? By Dylan Thomas This poem, in the form of a villanelle, is about the universal subject of death. As line sixteen suggests, the speaker is not only talking about death to us, but to his father as well: And you, my father, there on the sad height, (l. 16) The speaker does not want his father to accept death passively. He wishes his father would fight death just as the types of men he mentions in stanzas two to five have done. For instance in stanza two, the men want to continue living until their words influence people if they die without doing this then they would have been useless in life. As further proof - in stanza four the wild men have chased life, caught it and have felt successful in doing so. But by chasing life they have not lived it and they regret this. Consequently they also want to maintain living life in order to live it instead of chase it. The father is not like them in that sense, which is why in line sixteen he is distanced from the speaker by the use of the word height (see above quotation). Because this is a villanelle, the father is further separated from the other men because he is mentioned in the only quatrain rather than a tercet. Furthermore this encourages the reader to notice this stanza, and highlights the importance of it too. The poet is disappointed that his father is unlike these other men because he does not want his father to die. When parents die, we lose our last grasp of childhood. Our parents are no longer around to care for us, so we have to look after ourselves we are forced to mature and become more responsible. Thomas feels very emotional about this. Rage, fierce and curse are all very strong and emotive words displaying his feelings well. Perhaps he wants his father to live longer for the reason that Thomas was not really in control of his own life. He was renowned for his alcohol addiction, and this shows that he was not in control of himself. He probably feared his father dying because it would mean he would have to be more responsible of himself which he did not want. As a result he tried to persuade his father to live for longer. The title of the poem is an instruction. As death is a universal subject, he is telling his father and his readers that you should fight death. The repetition of this line strengthens the speakers thoughts and constantly reminds us to not react passively towards death. Repetition helps to enforce the tone of the poet, which is emotional and influential. The use of single syllable rhyming has a telling impact, which creates an almost authoritarian atmosphere. This relates to the title that is authoritarian because he uses Do not go. There is no perhaps or you might want to. This is how Thomas wants us to react towards death. Lines fourteen and fifteen display how the rhyming has this similar effect: Blind eyes should blaze like meteors and be gay. Rage, rage against the dying of the light. The use of Do not go... in the title, helps to display the poets emotion. Throughout the poem, Thomas has employed two metaphors; light represents life, and darkness indicates death. There are other words that relate to these metaphors. For example in the title the use of the word night relates to darkness and therefore death, and in the fifth stanza blaze reminds us of light and therefore life. These words continuously recap the central theme in the poem death. In the title he also refers to night (and therefore death) as good. This may be a reference to the afterlife being good but as with most of the poem, it is up for interpretation. Regardless of the meaning, this single word creates a more positive poem signifying hope, and composing a more enjoyable villanelle to read. Through the repetition of g words in the title, alliteration has been employed: go, gentle, good. This does two things firstly it strengthens this refrain and

Sunday, November 24, 2019

Is Technology Always for the B essays

Is Technology Always for the B essays Is Technology Always for the Better? Where would America be without the technological advancements of our age? Would we be a third world nation? Maybe not even a nation at all. Is there such a thing as too much advancement? Technology has integrated itself into our society. It affects how we work and play. It will shape our future as it has our past. The Internet shares information worldwide to the dismay of many. Computers have made many of our lives easier. In the process, they have cost jobs, security, and the ethics of our nation. To say that technology has changed the way we live would be an understatement. From the buildings that we work in, to the cars that we drive, or even the food that we eat, technology has become ever prevalent. Countries will lie, cheat and steal to stay ahead in this technological age because of the monetary benefits. As companies with new technologies climb the DOW Jones charts, society is benefiting from the economic windfalls. The economies of nations depend on their ever-changing technology. Computers and robotics have revolutionized industry. There has been a reduction of errors. An increase in production has been a benefit. Technology has also improved the safety of many workplaces. Many jobs that are physically or chemically hazardous can now be accomplished safely with a push of a button. Unfortunately, this has cost jobs. As growth in the industry should increase labor, it reduces the need for blue-collar workers. Education has become a premium that people cannot afford to do without. Impoverished families cannot afford education and their youth in urban neighborhoods have little chance to pursue higher education. As little as two generations ago, a family could be considered middle class based on the incomes of hard working parents. Now the gap between degree-laden people and the masses has created an abundance of cheap labor. This has left many families to struggl...

Thursday, November 21, 2019

The Overall Picture for Benefit-Cost Analysis for Illicit Drugs in Research Paper

The Overall Picture for Benefit-Cost Analysis for Illicit Drugs in General and for Cocaine and Heroin - Research Paper Example Rosen (1995) emphasised on the mathematics part of benefit-cost assessments. At the same time, he also emphasised that instead of benefit-cost assessments, cost-effectiveness may be the better approach to use for some projects or decisions involving intangibles. Stiglitz (2000) proposed a set of principles for measuring non-monetized costs and benefits. He prescribed a set of techniques for valuing time, life, and another alternative method of valuation (2000, p. 278-283). Rather than conceding on the concepts of â€Å"intangibles†, it seems that Stiglitz emphasised on monetisation end emphasised that the concept of benefit-cost analysis is â€Å"developing systematic ways of analyzing costs and benefits when market pride do not reflect social costs and benefits† (2000, p. 274). In 1998, the Risk and Policy Analysis Limited prepared a document for the European Commission elaborating on the techniques of benefit-cost assessment. The document is used for policy and propos als evaluations. We are guided by the said materials as we explore on the benefit-cost assessment of legalising the use of cocaine and heroin. As pointed out by the Matrix Knowledge Group (2007), the drug supply chain covers several continents. This is also discussed in Fox and Albertson (2010, Lecture 1 Slide 18). The drug supply chain includes the dealers who bring the drugs into the UK from overseas, the dealers who distribute the drugs at the national level or the dealers who buy the drugs in one city and sell it in another (Matrix Knowledge Group 2007, p. 17).